White House incident sends high-profile message, but is it one that more or less regulation of drones is needed.
Drone age takes flight, and FAA’s not ready
A drunken man’s 3 a.m. drone flight into President Obama’s backyard Monday revealed a fresh vulnerability in White House security, but as risks go, the incident doesn’t suggest there’s much to worry about. A 2-pound drone can’t do much damage to a heavily fortified building, even flying at its top speed of 20 mph–30 mph.
Rather, the incident sends a high-profile message that the drone age is taking full flight, and bringing with it a host of issues about security, safety and privacy that have yet to be addressed.
For the White House and other sensitive facilities, the need is easy to define: technology — now lacking — to detect drones of all types and weapons to quickly and safely disable small drones that could one day carry explosives.
The Secret Service appears to have neither, but options are emerging as the need grows. The military, for instance, is deploying ship-based laser cannons, a technology that might be adapted for use against small drones.
And if the Secret Service wants to explore an innovative detection system, it might pick up some tips from South Carolina’s prison officials, who are having their own issues with drones that fly over the walls at night to deliver contraband. They
Article source: http://www.clarionledger.com/story/opinion/editorials/2015/01/30/issue-regulating-drones/22615719/








