In August 2013, in an effort to convince the population of north-west England that “fracking” (drilling for shale gas) was good for them, British Prime Minister David Cameron assured everyone they would save several pounds on each month’s energy bill. Like Margaret Thatcher (who said “there is no such thing as society”) or George W Bush (who told Americans that the best response to 9/11 was to go shopping), Cameron believes he leads a nation of passive consumers. Justifying fracking – by then controversial due to earthquakes – on the basis of saving enough energy money to buy something more frivolous was the end of the argument as far as he was concerned. But the Anglican Bishops meeting in Liverpool fired back that this was not about saving a few quid on energy bills. The real issue, they insisted, is our “responsibility as stewards of the Earth”.
This difference of opinion exemplifies a seismic cultural shift currently in progress: from a society based on consumerism to one that embraces stewardship and sharing. This shift will have far-reaching consequences for our economy and our personal lives. We are still in the early stages of the transition because consumerism is so strongly based on the oil and gas on which our world still depends. But as the use of renewable energy increases, so too grows the culture of stewardship.
Each energy source brings certain cultural values with it, either because of what we have to do to get it (as with coal) or by virtue of the
Article source: http://europe.newsweek.com/energy-debate-really-revolution-what-we-think-about-everything-329965